Mortgage Credit News - January 27, 2006
This has been a big week in the markets, and painful for mortgages. Next week will be bigger, and the odds favor additional discomfort. Mortgages are decisively out of the 6.00-6.125% range; now 6.25%, threatening 6.50% as early as next Friday. The headlines in the last 48 hours have been a maximum-volume garble, guaranteed to confuse clients. The bottom line beneath the noise: rates are rising because the economy is hotter than thought, the market is weary of Treasury borrowing, and the Fed is not as close to being done as hoped. The garble. 4th quarter 2005 GDP grew by a meager 1.1%, less than half the forecast. In what way is that “hotter than thought?” Sales of existing homes plunged 5.7% in December, roughly four times the forecast decline. Hot, huh? Mark Twain said of Wagner’s music: “It’s better than it sounds.” Thus, the economy. The GDP number was suppressed by a string of statistical curiosities: a vestige of Katrina, a decline in business investment not appearing in any other data (December orders for durable goods soared 1.5%), and a bookkeeping “decline” in government spending. The housing market’s overheated regions are slowing, but the link to consumer spending is more theoretical than in evidence; and, this morning’s report of sales of new homes gained 2.9% versus the 1.5% forecast decline. The soft news was suspect, but all the strong data looked real. The market gave great weight to a positive change in a job-market indicator. Each Thursday brings the count of people who filed new claims for unemployment insurance in the prior week. The series is wildly volatile and subject to calendar quirks: you can’t file a claim on a holiday, or during a hurricane, but the line is long afterwards. However, the four-week moving average is reliable, and in January has phase-shifted downward: new claims are running at the lowest level since 2000. If claims are down, layoffs are lower and hiring is stronger. In the bond market, the most-watched single economic datum is the first-Friday-of-the-month payroll report for the prior month. If these declining claims show up next Friday as a surge in January payrolls, we will have a modest explosion in all long-term interest rates. Even if the payroll number is tepid, the financing of the budget deficit will exert upward force. The Treasury does its borrowing in clumps during the year, and during the next two weeks will borrow $112 billion in new cash. Many Republicans are fond of repeating the slogan, “deficits don’t matter”, or advocate “starving the beast” of revenue, or pretend that a deficit-controlling plan is in place. I cannot describe the quiet rage at bond-trading desks (heavily populated with Republicans) when one of these official lines scrolls across screens. Then there’s the Fed. Whee. Inside the GDP report lies the definitive measure of inflation: the “core personal consumption expenditures deflator.” The 4th quarter PCE jumped from 1.4% to 2.2%, which $65 oil will do to you. Aside from all that eyewash about Mr. Bernanke having to prove how tough he is, the Fed must err on the side of fighting inflation. The only thing separating us from a very bad bout of oil flu has been globalized labor keeping wages under control. Hopes that the Fed would stop at 4.50% on Tuesday are gone, and 4.75% in March and 5.00% in May are better bets. Now the perverse part. In the traditional slowdown cycle, housing is early to fade, and employment is the last to let go. Tradition is shaping up nicely. The more resilient the economy, the tougher the Fed has to be, and the more likely and deep the slowdown ahead -- and a downward reversal in long-term rates. Later... later. There is a chance that the Treasury’s borrowing is the strongest force in play right now, and will abate during the concluding week, about February 8. In the meantime, duck.
© Boulder West Financial Services, Inc.
Mortgage Credit News - January 20, 2006
Mortgage rates are still in the same narrow band they’ve been in since the holidays: 6.125%, plus or minus a debate about closing costs, but no points and no origination fee. This narrow range should not be confused with stability. In the last two days, concerns about Iran have overwhelmed everything; but, before laying out the market implications of that one, everything else first. At the top of the list of standard economics is the standoff between the bet on economic slowdown and the one that all is well. In late December, bond yields fell in growing belief that that a slowdown was inevitable, the Fed was not merely going to stop its campaign but would have to reverse, and the only question for 2006 would be how steep the slowdown. Everybody else -- economists, stock-market heroes, small-business execs -- disagrees. The bond (and hence, mortgage) market is stuck, waiting for data to show who is right. On the good news side, December industrial production rose .6%, on target, and capacity in use rose to 80.7%, the best figure since 2000. New claims for unemployment insurance fell a surprise 36,000 to 271,000, also the best number since 2000. The slowdown side expects an abrupt cooling in the housing market, and the newest data supports a cool-off: December housing starts fell twice as far as the already-weak forecast, down 8.9%, and new permits fell 4.4%. On net, the week’s good-news, bad-news data were a standoff. The next economic item adding to the appearance of stability is the trading-desk toe-tapping, knuckle-drumming, pencil-rolling, spitball-shooting wait for Ben Bernanke. The Fed’s next meeting is his deal, and nobody wants to place a big bet in advance of his first post-meeting statement, to be released after lunch on Feb 1. The Friday following brings a ton of January data, and then more anxious waiting: no sooner does Bernanke take the chair than he has to show up in Congress on February 15th to describe monetary policy for the coming year. Be on the lookout for perverse outcomes! If Bernanke signals inflation concern, the economy running unsustainably hot, more rate-hikes to come -- that’s the bond market’s dream of Christmas, because it increases the chance of a tough-side Fed error, a recession in which bond owners would make a ton of money. On the other hand, if Mr. Bernanke gives us a benign lot of stuff -- inflation okay, no more rate hikes -- the bond market will lose its hope of Fed-overdoing and recession, and move to it’s standard opinion of Fed chiefs: timid until proven otherwise. Iran. How can you tell that a geopolitical flyer like that has taken charge of markets? There isn’t any new economic data today. However, oil has spiked above $66, some buying clearly self-protective in case of supply interruption. A game of boycott chicken is at hand: whether the West took action to choke Iran’s oil exports, or Iran cut off the West in counter-‘cott response to sanctions, the world would be short about 3.5myn/bbl/day. Hello, three-digit oil. How close could such an event be? Pretty good quality information today has Iran pulling financial assets out of Europe, to prevent their being frozen by sanctions. Fridays tend to see action like this, as nobody wants to be exposed over a weekend. Part of gold’s pop above $550 is Iran-related. The Dow is in a 150-point crater today, partly earnings worries, mostly Iran and oil. The last tip-off is the trade that is not happening. Any geopolitical crisis pushes money to safety in bonds... except one. We have managed to tolerate sixty-buck oil without going into inflation; a hundred bucks plus, and there is no stopping it. Frightened money today went to plain, old, cash.
© Boulder West Financial Services, Inc.
Mortgage Credit News - January 13, 2006
After a mid-week pop-up in long-term rates, they are back down, mortgages again approaching 6.00%. The pop-up was a form of boredom: after three weeks near 4.35%, unable to move lower, the 10-year T-note wandered upward. The threat of breaking out of the top of a sub-4.50% range reversed today on three forces, in approximate order of importance: good inflation news, suspiciously weak-side economic data, and money moving to Treasurys for safety (Iran...). This morning’s producer price data were terrific: the December core rate rose only .1%, year-over-year only 1.7%, and in a declining trend. There are some healthy data: new claims for unemployment insurance are holding low, the job market overall in its best shape since 2000. And, mortgage applications have recovered from a holiday slowdown. However, the preponderance of other data is moving toward the slowdown side. December retail sales came in slightly below the .9% overall forecast at .7%, but ex-auto sales (inflated by desperate Detroit giveaways) the remainder was a slim .2% gain. Many analysts point to energy costs -- the first hit from spectacular heating bills -- but the huge cumulative rate hike from the Fed may be more important. Two more indications of slowdown ahead are lagging reports from last fall -- some stuff takes forever to gather and collate. To a bond trader, “last fall” is as important as the French Revolution; however, the significance of consumer credit and home-equity-line-of-credit (HELOC) usage trump delay. We learned this week that consumer credit contracted in October and November in the first back-to-back decline since 1992 (a recession then-about). We also learned that new HELOC volume dropped in the July-September quarter, and the only significant increase was in the “finance company” category, the typical provider to lower-credit borrowers. It’s early, and the slip in consumer credit demand last year may be Hurricane-related, gasoline-related, or some other transient event. However, it was also the interval in which Fed hikes began to bite, taking HELOCs above 7%. The slowdown-indicating “inversion” over the holidays dissolved last week, but is back in different form this week. In order, 2-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year T-note yields today are: 4.34%, 4.29%, 4.29%, and 4.36%. A “dish” like that in the middle of the yield curve is just as indicative of slowdown ahead as 10s under 2s. Iraq has been a slow-motion corrosive, not moving markets since the invasion in ’03. Developments around Iran before this long weekend are pushing some money to Treasurys for safety. Iran is coiling to jump the nuclear fence, and several long-term unknowns are now short-term. Will Russia and China join the US and Europe to bring pressure to bear? If so, will it work? If not, might Israel pre-empt (with or without new leadership)? What if the US and Europe are on their own? Two weeks ago Russia choked-off Europe’s gas tap, a point lost on no one. China was last active in world affairs 500 years ago; though it does appear to have put the kibosh on North Korea, next door, it seems to see the rest of the world as no more than unruly customers and suppliers (Iran!). Mutual trade is the route to mutual riches, as Holland, England, Spain and Portugal discovered at the same time that China withdrew inward. Global trade cannot be conducted without security, the absolute pre-requisite, and I hope that Mr. Putin and the collective in Beijing are giving that concept a thought. Taking pleasure by flexing muscles of empires past, and at the sight of Europe in decline, and at America bogged down and over-extended... that is one thing. The stability of a trading system, and the world, is another.
© Boulder West Financial Services, Inc.
Mortgage Credit News - November 18, 2005
Big doings this week. The tentative signs last week of a top in long-term rates this week turned into a brass band blaring the news.
The 10-year T-note fell as low as 4.45% yesterday, down from the scary top just short of 4.70% only ten business days ago. Yes, mortgage rates are supposed to follow the 10-year, but this time for technical reasons involving hedging of rate risk, fixed-rate mortgages are stuck just north of 6.25%. And, don’t confuse a top with the prospects for a decline, the latter not good.
The change at hand is the shift from fear that the Fed would continue to raise the cost of money from its current 4.00% up to 5.00% or more, open-ended into 2006, to the belief that the Fed is very close to being done. The bond market is telling the Fed that neutral is nigh.
The Fed meets next on December 13, and all still expect 4.25% at that meeting, and most expect 4.50% at Mr. Bernanke’s first meeting on February 1st. This week’s trading has removed thought of the Fed going beyond 4.50%, and has called into question the wisdom of going any further at all; the pattern of rates across all maturities suggests that if the Fed does go to 4.50% it will not be able to stay so high for long.
Pay no attention to prognosticators in this situation because few have done well. Instead, pay attention to the market, the cumulative vote by $30 trillion invested in bonds. Pay attention to two changes in the market: the drop in the ten-year is a big deal, but two other things are bigger. First, the crucial, Fed-predicting 2-year to 10-year spread; and second, the behavior of the 2-year T-note itself.
The 2s-to-10s spread last week broke inside .20% for the first time in this tightening cycle (except for that misbegotten Katrina scare), and this week inside .10% -- at the narrowest, .07%. Mr. Greenspan obscured the importance of a narrow spread with his “conundrum” fog, but traditional analysis is winning out over the Chairman’s this-time-it’s-different: a narrow spread reflects a tough Fed and portends a slower economy. Narrow spreads have always done so, and still do.
The key data this week causing the spread to narrow was cumulative testimony that the housing market is slowing, perhaps abruptly. October housing starts and permits for new construction fell 5.6% and 6.7% respectively; a survey of home builders sank in November to levels of two years ago; surveys of real estate brokers show a sharp decline in contracts written; and several regions report deterioration in the listings-to-sales ratio. Throw in some benign inflation numbers and a visible topping in energy prices, and the-Fed-is-going-to-the-moon psychology has broken for the first time this year.
Really broken. The most extraordinary market move has been the outright decline in the 2-year, down .10% to 4.36%. The 2-year T-note must pay a yield higher than the Fed funds rate because it has two years of risk; the only time the 2-year pays less than the Fed is when rates are on the way down. Specifically, when it’s clear that the Fed has overdone a tightening episode and will have to retreat. The 4.36% 2-year is the brass band: it says the Fed will not go to 4.50%, and if it does will soon wish that it had not.
So far, so good, but we’re a long way from the economic weakness that would cause a Fed reversal, or mortgages back in the fives. Industrial production, capacity utilization, and the job market are all doing fine.
There is a better than 50-50 chance that Mr. Greenspan’s final circus act will be to deliver a reasonably stable economy and rate structure to his successor, inflation risks waning, and housing cooling. He hasn’t been called Maestro for nothing.
© Boulder West Financial Services, Inc.
Mortgage Credit News - November 4, 2005
Long-term rates have risen in a straight line since Labor Day, now more than one-half percent. The 10-year T-note, 4.67% today, has taken out several technical stops without pause, and 30-year low-fee mortgages are at the doorstep of 6.50%.
Bonds were hurt by some fairly strong economic data, and by inflation discussions shifting to a how-bad-is-it competition, but the real damage to rates is coming from the Fed. The light has dawned that wherever neutral was before oil hit sixty bucks, it is higher now. Further, the location of neutral is passing into historical curiosity as the Fed will likely have to tighten past neutral, going as far as necessary to intercept inflation pressure... going until the economy visibly slows.
The Fed’s fingerprints are on the crucial Treasury 2-year to 10-year spread: it’s been steady at a very narrow .20% for four months. Long-term rates are rising because the Fed is bulldozing the whole rate structure upward from underneath; if the bond market thought the Fed wasn’t tough enough, 10s would be pulling away from 2s. However, this .20% 2s-to-10s spread says nothing about high the Fed will ultimately go. The stop signal would be 2s converging on 10s, or rising above.
The first data from October show an economy if anything accelerating from the pre-Katrina pace. The twin reports from the purchasing managers association show manufacturing running hot, above the 59 level, and the service sector in a strong October rebound, to 60 from 53 in September. Same-store retail sales (the measure removes distortion from new openings) soared 4.4% in October.
There is no sign whatever that consumers have been hurt by high energy prices, rising interest rates, or by anything else.
In modest good news for inflation, labor productivity in the third quarter increased at double the forecast pace. However, news this morning that price pressure is moving into wages overwhelmed everything else, including weak growth in the big-company payroll survey.
The fingerprints may be the Fed’s, but mortgages are doing the heavy lifting. The big selling in the bond market this week was mortgage-related: the proud owners of $5.5 trillion-worth of fixed-rate mortgages have to go short bonds to hedge their positions. As one result, this was one of the rare weeks in which mortgage rates rose more than long Treasurys’.
Fixed mortgage rates are now about even with the highs in each year since 2001. How high they will have to go to cut into home purchases... we won’t know until we are there. Classically, a 2.50% rise is necessary to clamp the housing market: in recent examples, from 9.00% to 11.50% in 1989, and 7.00% to 9.50% in 1994. In the Fed’s last cycle, ’99-’00, mortgages went from 7.00% to 8.50%, but the technology bubble-burst collapsed the economy before housing broke.
So far, mortgages are only 1.25% percent above the cycle low, and on theory might have to rise to 7.75%. I doubt it. The anomaly in this cycle (among many) is the role of the adjustable-rate mortgage. In recent real estate expansion phases, ARMs were not important housing-market propellants: short-to-long rate spreads were narrow, and ARMs were no great advantage over fixed loans.
Contrariwise, in the four-year super-cycle now concluded, short-to-long spreads were the widest in a half-century, and ARMs for home buyers bordered on free money. No longer. Rates on five-year hybrid ARMs have almost doubled in eighteen months. Construction money has doubled. Piggy-back seconds, essential to the low-down payment market, have gone from five-something to eight-something.
Especially in the hottest housing markets, these adjustable and innovative products have accounted for more than half of all purchases, and suddenly have no utility at all.
Mortgage Credit News - October 28, 2005
Rates rose this week, the 10-year T-note reaching 4.60% at one point, taking low-fee mortgages to 6.25%. (Today’s newspaper headlines, “Mortgages To New High”, refer to Freddie Mac’s lagged-survey discovery of 6.15% last week.)
I assume that mortgages will continue to rise during the Fed’s coming progression: another .25% on Tuesday (to a 4.00% overnight cost of money, 7.00% prime), another .25% on December 13, and another on February 1 -- unless the economy croaks in the meantime.
Economic data are still hurricane-garbled, except for home sales which seem authentically strong. Third quarter GDP gained a terrific 3.8%, but the September one-third of the quarter is just a pleasant guess. Durable goods orders fell hard in September, but there is no way to know if the decline was real or storm-distorted.
Core inflation numbers in the GDP report were benign, but nobody knows if the Fed should be watching core numbers or the vastly higher nominal ones. Core makes sense if you expect a cyclical decline in energy prices ahead; however, if energy prices have taken a one-time ramp-up, no downside volatility coming, then a core inflation rate is a useless abstraction and the Fed has catching-up to do.
We may have Harriet Miers to thank for the Bernanke era. Only three weeks ago, the White House said that it was “broadening its search” for a new Fed Chairman, looking for someone in agreement with the Administration’s economic policies, and someone with whom the President would have “personal rapport.” Then, suddenly, we got one of the four mainstream guys.
The bond market gave its highest praise: it did nothing -- although the only nasty line about Bernanke came out of the bond market (of course). “Greenspan was a maestro; this guy is a music teacher.” Stocks soared 160 Dow points, indicating relief of fear of a Bush crony, but temporarily forgetting that any non-crony is going to whack the economy.
Bernanke’s first words as nominee were to emphasize the need for continuity, exactly the right thing to have said. Too bad he won’t be able to deliver.
Mr. Bernanke has been a life-long academic, studying monetary policy and building econometric models. He writes very well, and we will enjoy relief from Mr. Greenspan’s worst-anywhere-ever bureaucratic murk. Bernanke is at all accounts a good man, thoughtful, who knows the limits of his knowledge and economic theory.
That’s the good news. Mr. Greenspan’s hands-on experience when he ascended the throne included energy and housing markets, general business as consultant, and the one crucial component toughest for Mr. Bernanke to replace: Mr. Greenspan’s native political skill, sharpened by service in several administrations.
Mr. Greenspan conducted his 18 years as the Wizard of Oz (pay no attention to the fallible man behind the curtain!), and the act has been calming to markets world-wide. I suspect markets will tend toward volatility as they adjust to a different style.
However, Mr. Greenspan’s substance should not be confused with his stage play. Within months of his appointment he won the deep faith of markets by his deft handling of the ’87 stock market crash, followed by correct and courageous resumption of inflation-fighting. After that performance, he could have worn a monk’s habit and chanted in Latin, and still have held the markets’ confidence.
Mr. Bernanke will soon have a similar opportunity to win or dash market confidence: he must contain an inflation problem without crushing the economy. Complicating his life: structural Federal deficits, an unprecedented trade deficit, and no prospect of help from an irresponsible Congress and Administration.
Speaking for the class, good luck to you, Mr. Music Teacher.
Mortgage Credit News - October 21, 2005
It’s not enough to move low-fee mortgage rates below 6.00%, but the 10-year T-note flinched at 4.50% all week long, and this morning has retraced to 4.38%.
No data showing economic weakness caused the rate decline: the newest information says the national economy came through Katrina/Rita unimpaired.
Two things have helped long-term rates to find a top: the painful understanding that if the Fed is not yet tight enough to hurt, it soon will be; and second, unstable weakness in the stock market.
In the perverse world of bonds, inflation-scare stories help. It goes this way: if inflation is really worse than we think -- under-measured, misunderstood -- then the Fed will have to play catch-up, tightening longer-higher-faster. If the Fed is behind, then catch-up raises the chance of a recession to probable, and in a recession those who own bonds make a ton of money.
For the time being, I wouldn’t pay much attention to the hobgoblin in ketchup on the front porch. People who should know better quarrel all the time with inflation-measurement methodology; this time the quibble is with the housing fraction of the core rate, measured near zero in a time of double-digit home-price increases. Housing inflation is measured by rental equivalence, and as rents everywhere are flat, housing cost is not inflating. This approach is correct, as changes in the capital cost of homes have little to do with consumption prices and the value of currency.
Authentic concern for inflation is flashing amber, not red. We are in an energy-cost-pushed moment, and energy costs are likely to reverse in well-established cyclical pattern. So long as the energy-cost pressure does not move into consumer prices in general, or into wages, then the Fed is on track.
That track, probably 4.50% by the February 1st meeting, is by itself enough to raise recession chances. Fed Gov Donald Kohn (long-time Fed staffer, Friend Of Alan’s, and one very tough cookie who might just get the job): “We are not yet at a point where we can stop and watch the economy evolve for a while.”
Historically, as the Fed proceeds upward in these cycles, there has been a race to handicap. Who breaks first? Housing? Stocks? Consumers, or inventory-holding merchants and manufacturers? Way back, ‘50s and ‘60s, it was the inventory holders, dumping to escape high financing costs. Today, just-in-time management means that inventories hardly settle on pallets, and there’s not much to liquidate.
In the 70s and 80s, high rates chewed up housing first. Then, at the end of the ’99-’00 rate-hike, the stock market was the first to collapse (I admit my considerable personal relief).
Stocks are fading now despite pretty good earnings, a still-strong economy, and actually paying dividends (only 2% across the S&P 500, but better than the sub-1% prior to 2000). The Fed is part of the reason: the cost of buying on margin has more than doubled in a year; the rate of discount of future earnings has tripled, and the Fed is going to slow the economy sooner or later. Stocks are also heavy at the sight of GM and Ford slowly going out of business, and by the newest episode of Wall Street piracy. (They go on and on, I know, but half a billion dollars in fraud bankrupting Refco ninety days after it went public... really quite an achievement. Our national moral leadership is, of course, silent on the matter.)
Aggregate housing stats are still strong, but good testimony has some hot markets flipping from seller to buyer, and more poised to do so. Except for long interest-only loans, the whole universe of adjustable-rate mortgages is now useless; construction money has doubled; and a trillion-worth of home equity lines has gone from 4.00% 2002-2004 to 7.00%, and going higher. We’ll see the impact soon
© Boulder West Financial Services, Inc.
Mortgage Credit News - October 14, 2005
A coulda-been-worse inflation report today gave us a morning-only breather, rates rising again now, as they will continue to do.
Bonds and mortgages on Wednesday broke through crucial levels: the 10-year T-note through 4.42% to 4.49% (higher today), lowest-fee mortgages through 6.00% to 6.125% (a move which Freddie Mac’s survey won’t “discover” until next week).
The overall September Consumer Price Index rose 1.2%, the largest single-month gain in fourteen years, now a 4.7% year-over-year increase. However, the “core” rate, excluding volatile food and energy prices, rose only .1% -- just 2.0% YOY, down from 2.4% YOY in July.
Some have misunderstood the Fed, seeing it in a jawbone offensive against inflation, but not intending to raise its rate much farther because core inflation is under some control. Many others have mistakenly assumed that high energy prices would do the Fed’s work, slowing the economy. Give that up: September retail sales rose 1.1% excluding the collapse in SUV sales, and despite Katrina/Rita. There is some word of accumulating inventory of homes for sale, but no decline in aggregate sales, nor a decline in purchase mortgage applications.
Bonds and mortgages have not adjusted to the very great likelihood that the Fed will go .25% at each of the next three months’ meetings, putting Fed funds at 4.50% by February 1st. At that point, a lot of heavy lifting will have been done for the new Chairman (hope -- pray -- for Ben Bernanke or Donald Kohn), but any new Chairman faces market doubt about toughness, and the only way to demonstrate fortitude is to raise rates. Any flinch by the new Chairman will be interpreted as timidity, or execution of election-year instructions from the White House.
Fed politics aside, I don’t for the life of me know what is different about our economy now compared to 1994-1998, when the baseline for Fed funds was 5.00%-plus (mortgages 8.00%) and I don’t see any reason for the Fed to stop short of 5.00% unless and until the economy slows markedly. Inherent economic strength aside, the grotesque budget irresponsibility in Congress and at the White House is working to stimulate the economy, not slow it.
There are some signs of an energy top: oil is falling toward $60/bbl, wholesale gasoline is down fourteen cents to $1.68/gal, natural gas off almost two bucks to $12.85/hcf, and gold’s retreat from the $470s confirms the pattern. A sudden drop in oil to maybe $45/bbl would remove some inflation heat, but would also stimulate the economy, and a hot-running economy is the Fed’s fundamental problem.
Lagging behavior in mortgage rates is delaying the full effect of the Fed’s tightening. Fixed-rate mortgages are still below the 6.50% highs of the last three years, but the next .75% coming from the Fed is certain to push mortgages up toward 7.00% by spring. However, 7.00% was the low of the 1990s. Nobody knows or can know the level at which housing will crump.
Consumers are calling us, disturbed by the rate increases on their HELOCs, but are reacting to changes at least 45 days old. It seems to take a month-and-a-half for a rise in prime to make it all the way into payments, and consumers don’t have a clue that prime is already 6.75%, going to 7.50% by Presidents’ Day.
ARM indices are rising, T-bill and LIBOR-based ARMs going to the high sixes right now. However, the lagging indices, MTA and COFI, will take a year to eighteen months to fully reflect the Fed. If the Fed stops as low as 4.50%, the whole ARM universe will adjust above 7.00%.
This lagging mortgage action is one of many reasons that the Fed tends to overshoot its proper stopping point, and likely will this time, too.
© Boulder West Financial Services, Inc.
Home | Site Map | Company Info | Contact Us | Press Room | Terms of Service
Copyright ©2002-2005 American Money Network, LLC